A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
How could Michal bas Shaul wear tefillin when the Torah (תורה) prohibits cross-dressing? The shiur argues that lo yilbash prohibits assuming a different social identity, not wearing specific objects temporarily for mitzvos. This principle extends to contemporary gender roles, which reflect inherent divine design rather than cultural constructs.
Rabbi Zweig presents a novel interpretation of the prohibition against cross-dressing found in Parshas Ki Seitzei. The shiur begins by addressing a classic question: how could Michal bas Shaul wear tefillin, as mentioned in Gemara (גמרא) Eruvin, when the Targum Yonasan ben Uziel explicitly states that women should not wear tzitzis and tefillin? Traditional answers suggest that tefillin is not considered a garment (beged) or that the prohibition doesn't apply to daughters of kings (as found in the Levush). Rabbi Zweig proposes a simpler solution: the prohibition of lo yilbash is not about specific objects but about assuming a different social identity. In Temple times, men wore tefillin all day as their identifying dress, while Michal merely put on tefillin temporarily for the mitzvah (מצוה), similar to how we wear them today only during prayer. This temporary wearing for mitzvah purposes doesn't constitute taking on a man's identity.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Ki Seitzei 22:5
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah repeatedly command us to keep mitzvos fresh 'as if commanded today' - doesn't this seem artificial? The key insight redefines 'metzavecha' not as burdens imposed but as divine appointments, where God elevates us to run His world. Remembering this honor daily generates natural enthusiasm for mitzvah observance.
Why does the Rambam place the laws of bechirah in Hilchos Teshuvah rather than among the fundamentals of faith? The shiur develops a chiddush that bechirah means we literally create ourselves through our choices - choosing good makes us good people, not just earns reward. This creative power explains why the same force that creates can also recreate through teshuvah.
Why does the Torah call us 'Am Naval' (ungrateful nation) precisely because we received the Torah? The shiur argues that receiving Torah creates responsibility to serve, not entitlement to be served. When Torah learning becomes a license for demanding support rather than giving back through teaching or community service, it transforms the greatest gift into the source of spiritual corruption.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
