No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Yaakov respond to Esav's question about his family by mentioning only the children? The shiur contrasts Yaakov's child-centered approach (where women are defined primarily as mothers) with Esav's wife-centered model. Modern society's shift toward viewing women primarily as partners rather than mothers undermines both women's fulfillment and children's emotional development.
Rabbi Zweig addresses what he considers the greatest change in family relations over the past 30-50 years: the shift from viewing women primarily as mothers to viewing them primarily as partners or companions. He draws from the encounter between Yaakov and Esav in Parshas Vayishlach to illustrate two fundamentally different approaches to family structure. When Esav asks "Who are these women and children?" Yaakov responds "These are the children that the Almighty gifted me with." The Ramban (רמב"ן) suggests Yaakov didn't feel proper mentioning the women directly, but Rabbi Zweig proposes that Yaakov's answer addresses both - the women are defined by their role as mothers. This interpretation is supported by Rashi (רש"י)'s observation that when relocating, Yaakov put children first, then wives, while Esav put wives first, then children.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Vayishlach - Yaakov and Esav's encounter
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!