No community start suggestion yet.
When the brothers recognize their guilt for selling Yosef, why does Reuven respond with seeming self-righteousness? The shiur argues that Reuven teaches a deeper level of teshuvah: responsibility isn't just about not carrying out a wrong act—it's about whether we had a better way. When someone hurts us, do we react to vindicate our pain, or do we help them address their underlying problem?
This shiur on Parshas Mikeitz examines a pivotal moment when the brothers, facing Yosef's threats of incarceration in Egypt, immediately acknowledge their guilt for selling Yosef years earlier. They recognize that when Yosef pleaded with them, they ignored his suffering, and now they are experiencing Divine justice measure-for-measure. This represents an extraordinary level of spiritual awareness: rather than seeking political solutions or bribes, they internalize that their current suffering stems from past moral failures. However, Reuven responds with what appears to be self-righteousness: "I told you not to sin against the boy." Rabbi Zweig asks why Reuven would berate brothers who are already doing proper teshuvah, and further notes that Reuven's claim is historically inaccurate—he never told them not to harm Yosef at all, only that they shouldn't kill him directly. The Gemara (גמרא)'s double language ("lo nakenu nefesh... al tishpechu dam") reveals two distinct prohibitions: don't sentence him to death, and don't execute that sentence.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 42:21-28 (Parshas Mikeitz)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!