A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does a Midrash compare Pharaoh's treatment of the Jews to violating shiluach hakan? The shiur argues that shiluach hakan isn't about sparing the mother bird's feelings, but ensuring everything fulfills its purpose—eggs as food, birds producing more. Pharaoh's sin was twofold: destroying Jewish children (denying their tachlis) and abandoning rather than properly sending the parents—leading to measure-for-measure punishment.
The shiur opens with a fascinating Midrash on Parshas Beshalach that compares Pharaoh's treatment of the Jewish people to a violation of shiluach hakan (sending away the mother bird). The Midrash states that Hashem (ה׳) wrote in the Torah (תורה) "shalach tishalach es ha'em v'es habanim tikach lach" (send away the mother and take the children), yet Pharaoh sent away the parents (the avos) while throwing the children into the Nile (banim hislachtu la'ya'or). As measure-for-measure punishment, Hashem threw Pharaoh into the sea while taking his daughter Basya to Gan Eden. Rabbi Zweig identifies a fundamental difficulty with this Midrash: if the violation of shiluach hakan is about preventing the mother's anguish at seeing her children taken, then Pharaoh's primary sin should have been killing the children in front of the parents, not sending the parents away afterward. The sequence and emphasis of the Midrash seem backwards. This forces a reexamination of what shiluach hakan is truly about.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Beshalach
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.