No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Eisav rename his wife Yehudis if she immediately practiced avodah zarah? The shiur explores how Eisav exploited first impressions to deceive Yitzchok, creating a perception that colored everything his parents saw. This dynamic illuminates the obligation of dan l'kaf zechus—to actively project positive perceptions of others—which transforms relationships and earns similar divine judgment.
Rabbi Zweig analyzes Rashi (רש"י)'s commentary on Parshas Vayishlach regarding Eisav's wife Ahalivamah, who was originally named Yehudis. Rashi explains that Eisav changed her name to Yehudis to deceive his father into thinking she rejected idolatry, yet she practiced avodah zarah immediately after marriage. This raises an obvious question: Eisav is no fool—why would he create a deception that would be exposed instantly? The answer lies in understanding the power of first impressions. When Eisav gave his wife the name "Yehudis," he created a mindset in his parents' perception. The name projected an image of a religious, righteous woman. Once this impression was established, Yitzchok and Rivka interpreted all subsequent actions through that lens. When she engaged in avodah zarah, they didn't see idolatry—they saw someone in outreach, or visiting a place of worship for other reasons. The projected image colored everything they observed. This is "marketing"—the first Madison Avenue campaign. The Torah (תורה) hints at this when it says "v'techeinah einei Yitzchok"—Yitzchok's eyes grew dim, partly from the smoke of idolatry, but also because the projected image clouded his vision.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Vayishlach, Bereishis 36 (Eisav's wives)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!