No community start suggestion yet.
May one perform milah on a child born already circumcised to fulfill the mitzvah (מצוה) of bris? The shiur explores whether hatafas dam bris is part of removing the orlah or a distinct mitzvah of entering Avrohom's covenant. This leads to a broader question: when does performing a mitzvah cross into achzarius—cruelty—toward one's child?
The shiur begins with a challenging Midrash Rabbah on Parashas Ki Seitzei that discusses the halacha (הלכה) of a tinok shenolad mahul—a child born already circumcised. The Midrash asks whether one is permitted to perform milah on such a child, and answers that one must be matitaf dam bris (draw blood) based on the verse "himo yimo" which teaches about the bris of Avrohom Avinu. Rabbi Zweig notes that the Midrash's formulation is difficult: it seems to have no connection to the parashah's discussion of shiluach hakan (sending away the mother bird), and the question itself is unclear. Rabbi Zweig reframes the question more precisely: Since a child born mahul has no obligation of milah, and since one is normally forbidden to wound another person (chavalah), is one permitted—or even obligated—to perform milah anyway? He suggests the question may extend beyond hatafas dam bris to include removing tzitzin she'eino me'akvin (small pieces of foreskin that don't invalidate the mitzvah (מצוה)). The Rambam (רמב"ם)'s position that once one's hand leaves after milah, one may not return even during the week to perfect the procedure cosmetically, raises the question sharply: if a child is born mahul but has some tzitzin remaining, may one remove them?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parashas Ki Seitzei 22:6-7 (shiluach hakan)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
