No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) write "Avrohom holid es Yitzchok" in Parshas Toldos when Yitzchok's birth was already described in Vayeira? Rabbi Zweig develops the idea that when Hashem (ה׳) made Yitzchok's face resemble Avrohom's (to silence mockers), He also altered Yitzchok's spiritual DNA, adding Avrohom's middah of chesed (חסד) to Yitzchok's gevurah. This explains why Yaakov and Esav have such divergent personalities: Esav reflects the Yitzchok aspect, while Yaakov embodies the Avrohom within Yitzchok.
The shiur opens with a textual question: Why does Parshas Toldos begin with "Avrohom holid es Yitzchok" when Yitzchok's birth was already recorded in Parshas Vayeira? The word "eileh" typically functions as a separator (as Rashi (רש"י) notes in Mishpatim), yet here it doesn't create a clean break from Yishmael's genealogy—because Esav represents another "Yishmael," another divergence that needs to be addressed. Rashi explains that the double language—both "Yitzchok ben Avrohom" and "Avrohom holid es Yitzchok"—teaches that Hashem (ה׳) performed a miracle making Yitzchok's face resemble Avrohom's. This miracle answered the mockers who said "mai Avimelech nasav l'Sarah" (perhaps Avimelech was the father). But Rabbi Zweig notes a chronological problem: the Gemara (גמרא) tells us this facial resemblance existed until age thirty-seven, when Hashem gave Avrohom the appearance of old age (zikna). So the miracle happened decades before Parshas Toldos. Why mention it here?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 25:19 (Parshas Toldos)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
