An exploration of the Talmudic contradiction regarding Mashiach's arrival - whether he'll come gloriously on clouds or humbly as a poor person on a donkey, analyzed through the lens of Moshe's unique kingship that manifested divine sovereignty.
This shiur analyzes a fundamental contradiction in the Talmud (תלמוד) regarding the arrival of Mashiach. The Gemara (גמרא) presents two seemingly opposing verses: one depicting Mashiach arriving 'with the clouds of heaven' (im ananei shamayim) suggesting glory and honor, while another describes him as 'a poor person riding on a donkey' (oni rochev al chamor) suggesting humility and poverty. The traditional resolution states that if we merit (zachu), Mashiach will come quickly with glory; if we don't merit (lo zachu), he will come slowly as a pauper. Rabbi Zweig challenges Rashi (רש"י)'s interpretation that this distinction is merely about speed (fast versus slow arrival), proposing instead a deeper understanding based on the nature of leadership and divine kingship. He examines the Gemara in Megillah (daf 9) regarding the Greek translation of the Torah (תורה), where the seventy-two sages miraculously avoided translating literally that Moshe returned to Egypt 'on a donkey,' instead writing 'on an animal that carries people' to avoid seeming disrespectful to royalty. The analysis focuses on the unique nature of Moshe's kingship as described in Parshas V'Zos HaBrachah ('Vayhi b'Yeshurun melech'). Rabbi Zweig resolves an apparent contradiction in Rashi's commentary by explaining that Moshe's kingship was fundamentally different from ordinary monarchy. Through the principle of 'Shechinah medaberes mitoch grono' (the Divine Presence speaks from his throat), when Moshe spoke, it was actually God speaking through him. Therefore, Moshe served as king not to establish his own authority, but to manifest God's direct kingship over Israel. This concept extends to understanding the 'oni rochev al chamor' motif. The 'oni' (poor person) represents complete self-nullification - having no ego, no personal agenda, and no independent existence. Such a leader doesn't establish his own kingship but serves purely as a conduit for divine rule. The Rambam (רמב"ם)'s description of the future Mashiach as being 'karov el Moshe Rabbeinu' (close to Moshe) in prophecy supports this - not because he will introduce new mitzvos, but because his speech must carry the same divine authority. The resolution of the contradiction becomes clear: When Israel doesn't merit redemption (lo zachu), God alone effects the redemption, requiring a completely self-nullified messenger (oni rochev al chamor) so that people recognize God as the sole redeemer. However, when Israel does merit redemption (zachu), the redemption becomes a partnership (hishtafus) between divine action and human merit, allowing the Mashiach to appear with honor (im ananei hakavod) as he represents both God and the worthy Jewish people. The shiur connects this to the Rambam's laws of Pesach (פסח), noting that while we're commanded to speak of the miracles 'that were done through Moshe,' the Haggadah barely mentions Moshe by name. This apparent contradiction resolves through understanding that the miracles done 'through Moshe' were actually done by God - Moshe served as the transparent vehicle for divine action, requiring no personal recognition.
Rabbi Zweig explores how Israel becomes God's 'mother' through accepting divine kingship, analyzing the deeper meaning of 'crowned by his mother' in Shir HaShirim and its connection to the grammatical ambiguity in 'Bereishis bara Elokim.'
Rabbi Zweig explores Eichah Rabba's interpretation of 'Bas Galim' (daughter of waves), revealing two distinct types of teshuvah: decisional repentance based on personal choice, and instinctive repentance rooted in learned behaviors from our forefathers.
Sanhedrin 98a
Sign in to access full transcripts
