No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Rashi (רש"י) give two different formulations for lifnei iver — "giving bad advice" in Kedoshim versus "persuading with bad advice" in Behar? The distinction reveals that manipulative persuasion constitutes an "action" that takes control over another person. This explains why the nachash received an arur — he didn't merely advise Chava but manipulated her into sin.
The shiur addresses an apparent contradiction in Rashi (רש"י)'s treatment of the prohibition of lifnei iver (placing a stumbling block before the blind). In Parshas Kedoshim, Rashi describes this law as giving bad advice, while in Parshas Behar, he describes it as persuading someone with bad advice. The question arises: why does Rashi present what appears to be the same law twice? Rabbi Zweig explains that these represent two distinct violations. In Kedoshim, the focus is on simply giving bad advice when asked — offering poor counsel without actively convincing the person. This constitutes the basic prohibition of lifnei iver. However, in Behar, the violation involves actively persuading and talking someone into following bad advice, which represents a more severe form of control and manipulation.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Kedoshim, Parshas Behar
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why did Potiphar's wife pursue Yosef, and what does Rashi mean when he calls her actions "leshem shamayim"? The shiur argues she correctly saw in astrology that she and Yosef would have a child—an unchangeable decree for most people. But as a descendant of Avrohom, whom Hashem lifted above the stars, Yosef possessed the unique power to bend astrological fate, transforming the prediction into fulfillment through her daughter (Osnas) instead.
Why did Hashem cure all the sick, blind, deaf, and lame before Matan Torah? The Rambam teaches that miracles require purpose. This shiur argues that the mass healing demonstrated that Torah is not meant for the downtrodden seeking comfort, but for healthy people who can fully channel their energies toward mitzvos and serve as proper examples to their communities.
Why does the Aramaic word for "accept" (Kabbalah) also mean "complain"? The shiur develops a profound insight: genuine acceptance only emerges from overcoming resistance. Without internal challenge, an idea merely passes through us—true commitment is born only when we wrestle with, resist, and ultimately decide to embrace a principle.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Why do we read Shir HaShirim on Pesach? The Abudarham traces it to the Red Sea, where Hashem appeared anthropomorphically to establish a love relationship with us—"demisich rayosi." The shiur explains that God's appearance in human form was necessary so we could love Him, since love requires relatability. This foundation of divine love shapes how we serve Hashem and relate to our families.
Why were the Jewish people given specific mitzvos at Marah, immediately after the Red Sea? The shiur develops that Marah marked the transition from society's right to exist (Noahide law) to the individual's right to exist (Jewish law). The three mitzvos—Shabbos, kibud av v'eim, and dinim—define what this right means, tempering entitlement with obligation and relationship.
