No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) sometimes describe a person's life using "days" (yom) and sometimes only "years" (shanim)? The shiur develops the thesis that yom refers to primordial light—those connected to God lived "days," not just 24-hour cycles. This distinction explains why tzadikim like the Avos have yemei attached to their deaths, while Sarah Imenu notably does not.
Rabbi Zweig opens with a textual anomaly in Parshas Vayechi: "Vayechi Yaakov b'Eretz Mitzrayim shva esrei shanah, vayechi Yaakov me'ah v'arba'im v'sheva shanah." The structure seems reversed—it sounds like Yaakov lived seventeen years in Egypt and was 147 years old at death, rather than lived 147 years total while spending seventeen in Egypt. This leads to a broader investigation: when does the Torah (תורה) use "yom" (days) versus "shanim" (years) to describe a person's lifespan? Examining the text carefully, Rabbi Zweig notes that by Sarah it says "Vayiyu chayei Sarah me'ah shanah," using years without mentioning days. By Avrohom, Yitzchok, and Yaakov, the Torah says "vayehi yemei"—the days of their lives. Similarly, by the first ten generations (from Adam to Noach), the Torah uses both yom and shanim, while the subsequent generations and other figures use only shanim. Noach himself has "vayechi kol yemei Noach." The shiur asks: what is the Torah conveying through this linguistic distinction?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 47:28, Bereishis 23:1 (Chayei Sarah)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
