No community start suggestion yet.
Why do we celebrate the oil miracle of Chanukah (חנוכה) but not the forty-year water miracle in the desert? The shiur develops that we never celebrate miracles themselves—we celebrate spiritual growth. The Chanukah miracle revealed our reclaimed understanding that Torah (תורה) is an etz chaim, a connection to infinite divine wisdom that gives life, while Greek chochma studies only the finite and dead.
Rabbi Zweig opens with a fundamental question: Why do we celebrate the eight-day Chanukah (חנוכה) oil miracle when far greater miracles—forty years of water in the desert, daily manna, the perpetual Ner Ma'aravi burning for eight hundred years—receive no holiday celebration? The answer, he proposes, is that the Jewish people never celebrate miracles per se. To celebrate God's ability to perform miracles is almost a bizayon—of course the Creator of reality can manipulate it. Rather, we celebrate spiritual growth and elevation. Every yom tov marks a moment when Klal Yisrael achieved a new level of existence. The miracle is merely Hashem (ה׳)'s way of communicating to us what that growth was and in what area we developed. The core of the shiur explores the fundamental difference between chochmas Yavan (Greek wisdom) and chochmas haTorah. The Gemara (גמרא) in Taanis relates that Alexander the Great asked the Chachmei HaNegev, "Eizu chacham?" They answered, "Haroeh es hanolad"—one who sees the future. Yet Pirkei Avos defines a chacham as "halomed mikol adam"—one who learns from everyone. Rabbi Zweig explains that these reflect two different types of wisdom. Greek chochma deals with understanding the finite physical world. Torah (תורה) deals with understanding the infinite—chochmas Hashem itself, the blueprint from which the finite world was created.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Chanukah celebration and meaning; Pirkei Avos 4:1; Taanis (Alexander the Great)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How was Yitzchok comforted after Sarah's death through marrying Rivka? The Hebrew 'vayinachem' means both comfort and change of direction, revealing that healing comes through shifting focus outward. Depression and mourning are self-absorbed states; true comfort emerges when we channel our pain into caring for others.
How could Avrohom keep the entire Torah before it was given, including rabbinical laws? The key insight is that mitzvos represent eternal spiritual realities, not just historical commemorations, so Avrohom could access these truths through his genuine search. His entire 172-year journey—even his early idolatry—retroactively became service of God once he reached ultimate truth.
Why does the Gemara say Avrohom knew God from age three while the Rambam says forty, after describing his idolatrous past? The principle that baalei teshuvah transform past sins into merits explains how Avrohom's early struggles became retroactive mitzvos once he used that experience to reach other idol worshippers. Unlike Shem and Ever who lacked such background, Avrohom's difficult past became his greatest qualification for helping others.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
