No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Rashi (רש"י) require the owner's participation in both loading and unloading his animal's burden? The word 'azov' means both help and abandon, teaching that true assistance enables eventual independence. Doing everything for someone who can participate creates harmful dependency rather than genuine help.
Rabbi Zweig analyzes the Torah (תורה)'s commandments regarding helping someone whose animal's burden has fallen (loading) versus helping someone whose animal is overburdened (unloading). He cites Rashi (רש"י)'s teaching that both mitzvos require the owner's participation - if the owner refuses to help and says 'you do it for me,' the bystander is not obligated to assist. The Taz questioned why Rashi only mentioned this requirement regarding loading, when unloading seems like a greater mitzvah (מצוה) since it relieves the animal's pain. Rabbi Zweig resolves this by explaining that there is no independent mitzvah to relieve an animal's pain - only a prohibition against causing such pain. When an owner overloads his animal, he violates this prohibition and becomes obligated to unload it. If he refuses to fulfill this obligation and tells someone else to do it, not only is the bystander not required to help, but helping would actually be harmful as it enables irresponsibility. The Hebrew word 'azov' (help) also means 'abandon,' teaching that true help enables someone to eventually become independent - to be 'abandoned' in the sense of self-sufficiency. If you cannot eventually abandon someone you're helping, then you're not truly helping but rather creating dependency. Rabbi Zweig extends this principle to parenting and community involvement. Parents who constantly do things for their children instead of helping them learn to do things themselves create the conditions that lead to problems like those described in the subsequent Torah portion of Ben Sorer U'Moreh (the rebellious child). He argues that modern affluent communities often give children everything without teaching responsibility, leading to serious problems including substance abuse. The difference between Sodom's wickedness and proper boundary-setting is that Sodom refused to help even those who genuinely could not help themselves, while proper chinuch involves helping when someone cannot do something but requiring participation when they can. Rabbi Zweig concludes with practical advice for Rosh Hashanah preparation: instead of adding more ritual observances, spend five minutes each night reviewing your day and taking responsibility for your actions - examining how you spoke to others and whether you acted properly. This self-examination, though brief, is often harder than hours of additional prayer because it requires taking genuine responsibility for oneself.
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Ki Seitzei 22:4
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!