No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Rashi (רש"י) require the owner's participation in both loading and unloading his animal's burden? The word 'azov' means both help and abandon, teaching that true assistance enables eventual independence. Doing everything for someone who can participate creates harmful dependency rather than genuine help.
Rabbi Zweig analyzes the Torah (תורה)'s commandments regarding helping someone whose animal's burden has fallen (loading) versus helping someone whose animal is overburdened (unloading). He cites Rashi (רש"י)'s teaching that both mitzvos require the owner's participation - if the owner refuses to help and says 'you do it for me,' the bystander is not obligated to assist. The Taz questioned why Rashi only mentioned this requirement regarding loading, when unloading seems like a greater mitzvah (מצוה) since it relieves the animal's pain. Rabbi Zweig resolves this by explaining that there is no independent mitzvah to relieve an animal's pain - only a prohibition against causing such pain. When an owner overloads his animal, he violates this prohibition and becomes obligated to unload it. If he refuses to fulfill this obligation and tells someone else to do it, not only is the bystander not required to help, but helping would actually be harmful as it enables irresponsibility. The Hebrew word 'azov' (help) also means 'abandon,' teaching that true help enables someone to eventually become independent - to be 'abandoned' in the sense of self-sufficiency. If you cannot eventually abandon someone you're helping, then you're not truly helping but rather creating dependency. Rabbi Zweig extends this principle to parenting and community involvement. Parents who constantly do things for their children instead of helping them learn to do things themselves create the conditions that lead to problems like those described in the subsequent Torah portion of Ben Sorer U'Moreh (the rebellious child). He argues that modern affluent communities often give children everything without teaching responsibility, leading to serious problems including substance abuse. The difference between Sodom's wickedness and proper boundary-setting is that Sodom refused to help even those who genuinely could not help themselves, while proper chinuch involves helping when someone cannot do something but requiring participation when they can. Rabbi Zweig concludes with practical advice for Rosh Hashanah preparation: instead of adding more ritual observances, spend five minutes each night reviewing your day and taking responsibility for your actions - examining how you spoke to others and whether you acted properly. This self-examination, though brief, is often harder than hours of additional prayer because it requires taking genuine responsibility for oneself.
Parshas Ki Seitzei 22:4
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.