No community start suggestion yet.
Does a grandchild owe a direct obligation to honor grandparents, or only indirectly through honoring parents? The shiur analyzes Parshas Vayigash 46:1 and Rashi (רש"י)'s proof that one owes more honor to a parent than a grandparent. Drawing on the Maharik, Rema, and Vilna Gaon, Rabbi Zweig resolves the seeming contradiction by distinguishing direct from derivative obligations—a child's duty to grandparents flows through the parent's honor.
Rabbi Zweig opens by examining the Torah (תורה)'s position on honoring grandparents, noting that while we as grandparents might have strong opinions on what the answer should be, the question is what Jewish law actually requires. The shiur focuses on Parshas Vayigash 46:1, where Yaakov travels to Egypt and brings sacrifices "to the God of his father Yitzchok"—conspicuously omitting his grandfather Avrohom, despite having mentioned both in earlier contexts. Rashi (רש"י) comments that from this verse we learn that "a person is obligated to honor his father more than his grandfather." The Ramban (רמב"ן) challenges Rashi's proof: why not mention both? Even if the father takes precedence, what prevents including the grandfather as well? This question opens a fundamental dispute in Jewish law. The Maharik rules that a person is not obligated to honor his grandfather at all, while the Rema disagrees, maintaining that there is an obligation to grandparents, though the father's honor takes precedence. The Taz expresses disbelief that the Maharik could have been unaware of Rashi's explicit statement.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 46:1 (Parshas Vayigash)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
