A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Yaakov tell his sons "Lamah tisra'u" — not to display even a perutah (minimal amount) when going to Egypt during the famine? The shiur explores whether this is about sensitivity to hunger, avoiding displaying wealth, or a deeper message about whether success should be shown as proof that righteousness brings blessing. The discussion raises the question of when it's appropriate to demonstrate that following Torah (תורה) leads to prosperity.
Rabbi Zweig analyzes the opening of Parshas Mikeitz, focusing on Yaakov's instruction to his sons before sending them to Egypt: "Lamah tisra'u" — why should you display yourselves? The Midrash explains this as "al totziu b'yedchem perutah" — don't go out with even a minimal amount of food in your hands. Rashi (רש"י) interprets it as not appearing "sevei'im" (satiated) before the children of Yishmael and Esav. The shiur presents a fundamental difficulty: Why would the tribes of Israel need Yaakov to teach them basic sensitivity? Surely they would naturally know not to display food in front of starving people. This is not merely about wealth — it's about basic human decency during a time of extreme hunger. The question becomes even stronger when we consider that the brothers were already at a level where such sensitivity should be obvious.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Bereishis 42:1 (Parshas Mikeitz)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
