No community start suggestion yet.
Why did the Jews stop performing bris milah after Yosef's death, even while the Shevatim were still alive? The shiur develops a chiddush that when Yaakov died, the Jews became legal slaves to Egypt under Egyptian citizenship law. As slaves, they were halachically obligated only in the seven Noahide laws, not the full Torah (תורה), until Hashem (ה׳) took them out of Egypt and established they could never be true slaves.
The shiur begins by examining Rashi (רש"י)'s statement that we can calculate the years of enslavement from Levi's lifespan. Rashi explains that as long as any of the Shevatim were alive, there was no shibud (servitude). However, this raises fundamental questions: Rashi elsewhere says the tzarah (trouble) of the shibud started when Yaakov died, yet the Torah (תורה) in Shemos states that the enslavement began only after "Vayamos Yosef v'chol echav v'chol hador hahu" - after Yosef, all his brothers, and that entire generation died. Furthermore, the Torah describes massive Jewish population growth between the death of the brothers and the start of active enslavement. The timeline appears contradictory. Rabbi Zweig proposes a crucial distinction between legal status and practical implementation. When Yaakov died, the Jews were conferred Egyptian citizenship. However, Egyptian citizenship had already been redefined by Yosef's policies during the famine years - all Egyptians (except the priests) had sold themselves to Pharaoh, meaning citizenship equaled slavery to the state. Thus, when the Jews received citizenship at Yaakov's death, they legally became slaves, though this status wasn't actively enforced yet. This explains why Vayechi is a parshah s'tumah (closed portion) - their eyes were sealed to the implications of this legal change.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Shemos (Vaeira period) - discussing events surrounding Yaakov's death and the onset of slavery
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.
