No community start suggestion yet.
Why were Jews exiled for violating Shmitah when Hashem (ה׳) promised triple harvests in the sixth year? The issue wasn't working during the seventh year but begrudging others the right to take freely from their fields. This reflects the deeper challenge of transforming from individual competitors to seeing ourselves as parts of the collective Jewish people - a perspective shift essential for receiving Torah (תורה) and meriting the Land of Israel.
Rabbi Zweig addresses a perplexing question: why were the Jewish people exiled for not observing the Sabbatical year (Shmitah) when it should have been the easiest mitzvah (מצוה) to fulfill? The Torah (תורה) promises that in the sixth year, Hashem (ה׳) provides enough food for three years, essentially paying in advance. If people already received triple the income, why would they worry about not working in the seventh year? The Rabbi proposes that the real issue wasn't working the fields during Shmitah, but rather begrudging others the right to take from their property. During the seventh year, landowners must allow others to enter their fields and take produce freely. This reflects a deeper human condition - the difficulty of seeing others benefit from what we consider ours, even when it costs us nothing.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Bechukosai and Behar
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
