A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
How could Avrohom challenge God's justice regarding Sodom when cities with more evil than good deserve destruction? The shiur develops that Bris Milah transforms divine governance from 'martial law' to covenant justice, granting humanity rights to existence and due process. This fundamental shift reframes our obligations to others as matters of justice rather than optional kindness.
This profound shiur examines the transformative power of Bris Milah through the lens of Avrohom's confrontation with God over Sodom. Rabbi Zweig begins by analyzing Rashi (רש"י)'s comment about Avrohom sitting during God's visit, establishing the connection to divine justice where God stands while judges sit. The core question emerges: how could Avrohom accuse God of injustice when the Rambam (רמב"ם) clearly states that cities with more evil than good are justly destroyed? The answer lies in understanding two distinct modes of divine governance: martial law versus justice. Before Bris Milah, God operated under what could be called 'martial law' - when a population rebels against divine authority (measured by having more sins than merits), they forfeit their rights and can be destroyed without due process. This is what happened with the flood and was planned for Sodom. However, Avrohom's Bris Milah created a covenant that fundamentally changed this dynamic.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Vayera 18:1
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
