No community start suggestion yet.
Why does violating shmita laws specifically indicate having an "ayin ra" (evil eye)? The shiur contrasts Yaakov's "I have everything I need" with Esau's "I have more than I need" - wanting things because they exist versus because they enhance life. Shmita reveals pure selfishness since God already compensated landowners with triple crops, making refusal to share with the poor a matter of control rather than loss.
Rabbi Zweig begins by examining why the Midrash specifically identifies violation of shmita laws as evidence of having an "ayin ra" (evil eye) - being obsessed with money. He poses three central questions: Why is this particular transgression singled out as demonstrating a "bad eye" more than other forms of stinginess? Why did the Jewish people historically struggle with shmita observance when God promises to provide three years' worth of crops in the sixth year, making it seemingly easy to observe? What does the Midrash mean when it says one either merits "the hunger of Yaakov" or suffers "the satisfaction of Esav"? The core distinction emerges through the contrast between Yaakov and Esau's attitudes toward wealth. When they meet, Yaakov says "yesh li kol" (I have everything I need) while Esau says "yesh li rov" (I have more than I need). Rabbi Zweig explains that Yaakov represents wanting things that enhance one's life and meet genuine needs - even if those needs include high standards of living and security. Esau represents wanting things simply because they exist, regardless of whether they provide any benefit.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Behar - Shmita laws
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize helping someone whose "hand is slipping" before they fall completely? Most people prefer dramatic rescues over quiet prevention because being a "savior" feels heroic while small help feels ordinary. True chesed requires deep involvement in others' lives to notice gradual decline, not just responding to obvious crises.
Why were Jews exiled for violating Shmitah when Hashem promised triple harvests in the sixth year? The issue wasn't working during the seventh year but begrudging others the right to take freely from their fields. This reflects the deeper challenge of transforming from individual competitors to seeing ourselves as parts of the collective Jewish people - a perspective shift essential for receiving Torah and meriting the Land of Israel.
Why did Rabbi Akiva's students die for lacking respect when their teacher emphasized loving others? The shiur explains they became so committed to each other that they developed mutual ownership and entitlement, losing the courtesy required even in justified expectations. This mirrors how marriage transitions from voluntary cooperation to binding commitment, requiring conscious effort to maintain respect within intimate bonds.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.