No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Hashem (ה׳) count the Jewish people in Iyar rather than Nissan when the Mishkan was inaugurated? The shiur develops the Maharal's distinction between transcendent and immanent divine presence - counting represents Hashem 'taking possession' of us for deeper connection. This transforms Klal Yisrael into His ambassadors, where connecting to a Jew means connecting to Hashem.
This shiur addresses several perplexing questions about the chronology and repetition in Sefer Bamidbar. The speaker notes that events from the same day (Rosh Chodesh Nissan) appear in Pekudei, Shemini, and Naso, creating an apparently illogical narrative structure. The opening of Bamidbar jumps to Rosh Chodesh Iyar, then Parshas Naso returns to earlier events, raising questions about the Torah (תורה)'s organizational approach. The central thesis emerges through analyzing Rashi (רש"י)'s commentary on why Hashem (ה׳) counted the Jewish people. Rashi explains 'ki sheba lehashir shechinaso aleihem monom' - when He came to rest His presence upon them, He counted them. The Maharal's difficulty is addressed: if the Shechinah descended on Rosh Chodesh Nissan with the inauguration of the Mishkan, why wait until Rosh Chodesh Iyar to count? The answer distinguishes between Shechinah being 'aleichem' (to them) versus 'aleihem' (upon them) - transcendent versus immanent presence.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Bamidbar, Parshas Naso
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
