No community start suggestion yet.
Did the Nile actually turn to blood during Makas Dam, or did it remain water that tasted like blood only to Egyptians? The death of the fish reveals that the water truly became blood—yet every time a Jew drank, a miracle occurred converting it back to water. Rashi (רש"י)'s language about "curing the Ye'or" proves the transformation was real, not perceptual.
The shiur analyzes a fundamental question about Makas Dam: when Hashem (ה׳) transformed the Nile to blood, was this a real physical transformation or a perceptual change affecting only Egyptians? The Torah (תורה) states that the water would become blood, the fish would die, and the Ye'or would stink. Rabbi Zweig notes this seems redundant—if water becomes blood, obviously fish will die. Why does the Torah need to state this explicitly? The answer depends on understanding what actually happened to the water. There are two possibilities: either the water didn't really become blood but only appeared/tasted like blood to Egyptians (while remaining water for Jews), or it truly became blood, requiring a miracle for Jews to drink it. If the water remained water and only affected Egyptians perceptually, there would be no reason for the fish to die—they would continue living in actual water. Therefore, the Torah's explicit statement that fish would die becomes necessary as a separate punishment, not merely a consequence.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Shemos 7:18, Parshas Vaeira
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.
