No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) tell the Jews entering Eretz Yisrael to remember Egypt rather than the recent victories over Sichon and Og? The pasuk reveals that Egypt was not a war—Hashem (ה׳) "toyed" with them ("hisalalti"). Unlike battles that instill fear, remembering Egypt meant remembering total dominance without struggle, the perfect mindset for entering the Land.
Rabbi Zweig presents a fundamental insight into the psychological preparation required for the Jewish people as they stood at the threshold of entering Eretz Yisrael. The question originates from Parshas Eikev, where the Torah (תורה) anticipates the Jews' natural fear of the powerful Canaanite nations and commands them to remember what Hashem (ה׳) did to Pharaoh and Egypt. The difficulty is glaring: this speech occurs in the fortieth year, mere weeks before entry into the Land. Anyone under forty years old was not yet born during the Exodus and has no personal memory of those events. Meanwhile, just months earlier, the entire nation witnessed and participated in the stunning defeats of Sichon and Og, described in the sources as "zro'os olam"—the Atlas-like protectors of the entire region, the most powerful kings in the world. The logical question becomes inescapable: if the purpose is to instill confidence and dispel fear, why does Hashem direct the people to recall events from four decades earlier that most of the population never experienced, rather than pointing to the overwhelming victories of just a few months prior? The recent conquest of Sichon and Og should have been the perfect memory to invoke—fresh, vivid, and universally remembered by all.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Devarim 7:17-18 (Parshas Eikev), Shemos 10:1-2 (Parshas Bo)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.