No community start suggestion yet.
How can human holiness theoretically exceed divine holiness, as suggested by a Midrash? The shiur develops a revolutionary understanding where kedushah means removing oneself from the center rather than closeness to God. God's ultimate holiness is His tzimtzum - self-contraction to create space for human choice - while human holiness mirrors this by making God's will our reality rather than struggling against it.
This shiur presents a revolutionary understanding of kedushah (holiness) that challenges the conventional definition. Rather than holiness being measured by one's closeness to God, Rabbi Zweig argues that kedushah means the ability to remove oneself from the center, based on a fundamental Midrash that suggests human holiness could theoretically exceed divine holiness - an impossibility if holiness were simply proximity to God. The analysis begins with Rashi (רש"י)'s interpretation that 'kedoshim tihyu' means separating from forbidden relations and foods. Rabbi Zweig questions how this could constitute a separate mitzvah (מצוה) when these prohibitions already exist. The resolution comes through understanding that kedushah represents a qualitatively different relationship to prohibitions - not struggling against desire while following commandments, but reaching a state where forbidden acts don't even enter one's consciousness.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Kedoshim 19:2
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Kohen Gadol sometimes function with different requirements and restrictions? The shiur develops a fundamental chakira that the Kohen Gadol operates in two distinct modes: as a kli haMishkan (holy vessel) and as melech of avodah (king of service). This dual nature explains apparent contradictions in garment requirements, anointing protocols, and why Yom Kippur specifically requires achieving the level of Aharon himself.
Why does the Torah introduce Aharon's Yom Kippur service by mentioning his sons' deaths? Aharon and his sons shared the same spiritual illness - they both participated in sins that caused separation from Hashem (the Chet HaEgel and inappropriate gazing at Sinai). Reminding Aharon of this danger energizes his true nature as unifier of Israel, making his Yom Kippur service the perfect tikun for the fragmentation of the golden calf.
What does 'Kedoshim Tiyu' mean - mere separation from sin or something more? The shiur contrasts Rashi's approach (holiness through avoiding forbidden acts) with the Ramban's vision of sanctifying even permitted activities to avoid being a 'naval b'reshus haTorah.' This reflects deeper disagreement about whether the body obstructs divine service or can itself become a vehicle for spiritual elevation.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.