No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Rambam (רמב"ם) require birkas eirusin before the marriage ceremony but lechinso l'bris after the milah? The shiur develops a chiddush that these brachos serve different purposes - one on the ma'aseh hamitzvah itself, requiring beforehand timing, the other on becoming a baal bris, which can be made afterward.
The shiur addresses a fundamental question raised by the Ritva against the Rambam (רמב"ם) regarding the timing of brachos. The Ritva questions why the Rambam requires birkas eirusin to be made before the marriage ceremony, but birkas lechinso l'bris is made after the milah. According to the Ritva, if the reason for making lechinso after milah is that the mohel might change his mind, then by the same logic, birkas eirusin should also be delayed since the woman might refuse. Rabbi Zweig presents a fundamental reinterpretation of the Rambam's position. He argues that the Rambam distinguishes between different types of mitzvos and their corresponding brachos. The Rambam in Hilchos Milah establishes that every Jew has an obligation to ensure there are no arelim (uncircumcised) in Israel - this is a communal responsibility focused on removing the status of orlah. However, the father has an additional, unique mitzvah (מצוה): to bring his son into the bris Avrohom Avinu, making him a baal bris.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Hilchos Milah 3:1-3, Hilchos Ishus
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Halacha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Rambam distinguish between immediate destruction and the judgment of Rosh Hashanah? The shiur develops a fundamental yesod that Hilchos Teshuvah distinguishes two frameworks: natural spiritual balance (where a negative force self-destructs) versus formal divine judgment (where consequences follow accountability). The Raavad's question—that we see wicked people alive—misses that judgment aims not at survival but at earning our existence through committed avodah.
What does it mean to truly do teshuva? Analyzing Rambam Hilchos Teshuva Perek 2, the shiur distinguishes vidui (confession that changes one's relationship with Hashem and brings kapara) from teshuva itself (a resolution to change one's life). Baal teshuva gemura requires returning to the exact situation—same act, same place, same person—and rejecting it, proving the past is no longer part of one's identity.
Why does the Rambam frame teshuva around vidui rather than behavioral change? The shiur develops the yesod that teshuva without vidui is merely self-improvement—changing behavior to avoid consequences or restore self-image. Vidui is "lifnei HaKel Baruch Hu," the mitzvah to restore one's relationship with Hashem, which alone ensures lasting change.
What is the difference between teshuvah and tza'akah, and why does the Rambam distinguish between individual and communal teshuvah? The shiur unpacks Hilchos Teshuvah 2:6, exploring how tza'akah differs from mere prayer, what lev shalem adds, and why Yom Kippur creates a unique obligation—not just an opportunity—for teshuvah, since failing to do teshuvah on the last day means internalizing sin as part of one's identity.
