No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Rambam (רמב"ם) require birkas eirusin before the marriage ceremony but lechinso l'bris after the milah? The shiur develops a chiddush that these brachos serve different purposes - one on the ma'aseh hamitzvah itself, requiring beforehand timing, the other on becoming a baal bris, which can be made afterward.
The shiur addresses a fundamental question raised by the Ritva against the Rambam (רמב"ם) regarding the timing of brachos. The Ritva questions why the Rambam requires birkas eirusin to be made before the marriage ceremony, but birkas lechinso l'bris is made after the milah. According to the Ritva, if the reason for making lechinso after milah is that the mohel might change his mind, then by the same logic, birkas eirusin should also be delayed since the woman might refuse. Rabbi Zweig presents a fundamental reinterpretation of the Rambam's position. He argues that the Rambam distinguishes between different types of mitzvos and their corresponding brachos. The Rambam in Hilchos Milah establishes that every Jew has an obligation to ensure there are no arelim (uncircumcised) in Israel - this is a communal responsibility focused on removing the status of orlah. However, the father has an additional, unique mitzvah (מצוה): to bring his son into the bris Avrohom Avinu, making him a baal bris.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Hilchos Milah 3:1-3, Hilchos Ishus
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Halacha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why is Asara b'Teves—merely a siege on Yerushalayim—a fast day at all, and why does it carry the unique stringency of never being postponed? The shiur develops the yesod that geulah unfolds in four stages (the arba lashonos), and galus reverses them in mirror order. The siege was the first step back—undoing kabbalas haTorah, the fourth and highest stage of freedom. A person locked in place, unable to travel, loses his ben chorin status, and with it his capacity for Torah.
Can korbanos be brought when the Beis Hamikdash is destroyed? The Rambam and Raavad debate whether "Hashem es Mikdasham" creates a din of Avoda during Churban. Rabbi Zweig develops a distinction: the Rambam holds kedusha Rishona enabled both korbanos and tefillah; the Raavad holds only tefillah remains when the edifice is gone, since Hashem's presence endures even without a physical structure.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
Why does the Rambam rule that one may not violate even a shvus (rabbinic prohibition) on Yom Tov to obtain a shofar, yet permit shofar blowing on Shabbos Rosh Hashanah despite the gezeirah of carrying it to an expert? The Lechem Mishneh wrestles with an apparent contradiction: in Hilchos Shofar 1:4 the Rambam treats shvus like a full lav vis-à-vis the mitzvah of shofar, but in 2:6 he allows shofar on Shabbos even though it involves overriding both a lav and an asei.