No community start suggestion yet.
Why does God promise Avrohom a land covenant when He already gave him Eretz Yisrael thirty years earlier? The shiur explains that bris milah represents a covenant of love where God "gives up" His superiority to merge as equals with Avrohom. This divine validation enables Avrohom to give moral guidance to his children—a lesson for today's parents who desperately seek their children's love instead of providing moral leadership.
The shiur analyzes Parshas Lech Lecha 17:1-8, focusing on the covenant of bris milah when Avrohom was ninety-nine years old. Rabbi Zweig addresses two fundamental questions: First, where does Rashi (רש"י) see "love" in God's covenant when the text mentions nothing about love? Second, why does God promise Avrohom the land of Israel when He already gave it to him thirty years earlier in the Bris Bein HaBesarim? The analysis centers on understanding the Hebrew word "nosati" (I will give) in the context of making a covenant. Rabbi Zweig explains that a bris normally requires the verb "kores" (to cut), implying a merger between two incomplete entities who open themselves to each other. However, when the Torah (תורה) uses "nosati" (give), it indicates something different—one party is giving up from themselves.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Lech Lecha 17:1-8
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
