No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Yaakov send messengers to Esav in Seir when he was supposed to be heading to Eretz Yisrael to see his father Yitzchok? The shiur reconciles the apparent contradiction by demonstrating that Esav was temporarily in Seir (his "winter home") while still residing primarily in Eretz Yisrael. Yaakov seized this opportunity to reconcile with his brother before arriving at their father's house, ensuring a peaceful homecoming.
This shiur addresses a fundamental textual difficulty in Parshas Vayishlach: Yaakov appears to be heading toward Esav in Seir when he should be traveling to Eretz Yisrael to reunite with his father Yitzchok. The opening pesukim state that Yaakov sent messengers "lifanav" (before him) to Esav in "Eretz Seir sdei Edom," suggesting Yaakov himself was heading there. Yet at the end of the previous parsha, the Torah (תורה) explicitly states that Yaakov was traveling toward Eretz Yisrael, and angels of Eretz Yisrael came to escort him there. Rabbi Zweig begins by establishing the geographic problem: Seir is southeast of Eretz Yisrael, essentially in the area of modern-day Saudi Arabia or Edom. If Yaakov was heading to his father in Chevron, why would he detour to Seir? More fundamentally, when did Yaakov decide to seek out Esav, and why would the malachei Eretz Yisrael—whose explicit mission according to Rashi (רש"י) is to escort Yaakov to the Land—accompany him on a trip outside Israel's borders?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 32:4, Vayishlach
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
