No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) say Reuven slept with his father's wife when he only moved his father's bed? The Torah holds leaders to a higher standard—violating the spirit of a law is as serious as violating its letter. King Dovid, Reuven, and Eli's sons were all judged not by technical compliance but by whether they internalized the character development the mitzvos demand.
Rabbi Zweig addresses a fundamental question in understanding Torah (תורה) ethics: Why does the Torah state that Reuven slept with his father's wife Bilhah when Rashi (רש"י) explicitly tells us he did not? The Gemara (גמרא) in Shabbos (שבת) 55b teaches that Reuven merely moved Yaakov's bed from Bilhah's tent to his mother Leah's tent, defending his mother's honor. Yet the Torah describes this as if he actually violated the prohibition of sleeping with his father's wife, and Yaakov later strips him of his firstborn privileges—kehunah and kingship—for this act. The shiur presents two additional parallel cases: King Dovid with Batsheva (Shabbos 56a) and the sons of Eli the High Priest with the women bringing sacrifices. In all three cases, the Gemara insists they did not technically sin—Batsheva was divorced through the get soldiers gave before battle, and Chofni and Pinchas merely delayed women's offerings—yet the Torah describes their actions as adultery and the perpetrators suffered severe consequences.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Vayishlach - Bereishis 35:22
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
