No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) state the purpose of the plagues as "so you shall tell your children...and then you will know I am Hashem (ה׳)"? The logic seems reversed—shouldn't knowing Hashem come first, then teaching children? The shiur explains that parents fundamentally become what their children become, as children represent our continuity; the direction children take will eventually draw parents along that same path.
The shiur opens with a striking difficulty in the Torah (תורה)'s formulation of the purpose of the Egyptian plagues. The verse in Parshas Bo states: "Lama'an tesaper be'oznei bincha uven bincha es asher hisalalti b'Mitzrayim ve'es ososai asher samti bam vidatem ki ani Hashem (ה׳)"—"So that you shall tell in the ears of your son and grandson what I did to Egypt and the signs I brought against them, and then you will know that I am Hashem." The logic appears backwards. Shouldn't the plagues first teach us to know Hashem, and only then do we transmit that knowledge to our children and grandchildren? Instead, the Torah presents it in reverse order: first tell your children, and then you will know. Rabbi Zweig offers a profound insight into human psychology and the parent-child relationship. The Torah is teaching us a fundamental truth about life: a person actually becomes what his children are. Parents naturally align themselves with their children's direction because children represent our continuity in this world. After 120 years, our children are who we are in this world, and therefore during our lifetimes, we don't want to feel alienated or separated from what our continuity will be.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Bo (Shemos 10:2)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.
