A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why were there two distinct three-day periods in the plague of darkness? The shiur develops the thesis that the first three days represented the removal of sunlight, while the second three days introduced the primordial darkness—total separation from God's presence. This explains Pharaoh's audacious post-plague declaration that Moshe would die if he saw his face again: having survived total disconnection from God, Pharaoh experienced a delusion of deity-level invincibility.
The shiur opens by examining the unusual language in Parshas Bo describing Makas Choshech. The Torah (תורה) first warns there will be darkness (choshech) and then describes it as "choshech afeila"—thick darkness. The pasuk states there were three days of darkness, yet Rashi (רש"י) explains there were actually six days: three days where Egyptians couldn't see each other, followed by three days where they couldn't move from their places. This raises fundamental questions about the structure of the plague. Rabbi Zweig explores the textual difficulty: why does the pasuk say "sheloshes yamim" (three days) twice? The text should logically describe the darkness first, then state its duration, rather than mentioning three days and then defining the nature of the darkness afterward. Additionally, the instruction "neteh yadcha al hashamayim" (stretch your hand over the heavens) is puzzling—the phrase "al hashamayim" suggests elevation above the heavens, which Rashi interprets as Moshe being lifted above the clouds.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Shemos, Parshas Bo
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
