No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Avos 4:5 praise learning 'al menas la'asos' when we're already obligated to observe what we learn? The shiur develops a yesod from 'na'aseh v'nishma' that doing itself becomes a learning experience—mitzvos transform us when we perform them with awareness of their potential impact. This reframes mitzvah (מצוה) observance from mechanical compliance to experiential growth.
Rabbi Zweig delivers an in-depth analysis of Pirkei Avos 4:5, where Rabbi Shmuel teaches about learning with the intention to teach versus learning with the intention to do. The shiur addresses several fundamental questions about this mishna, including why learning without doing isn't condemned here when other sources clearly prohibit it, and what makes learning 'al menas la'asos' (with intention to do) so meritorious. The rabbi reconciles apparent contradictions by explaining that this mishna isn't discussing basic obligation to observe what one learns, but rather a higher level where doing becomes a learning experience itself. The core insight centers on understanding 'na'aseh v'nishma' from Mount Sinai. Rather than the common interpretation that Jews committed to blind obedience, Rabbi Zweig argues it means 'we will do and we will learn from our doing.' This represents a fundamental shift in understanding mitzvos - not as obligations to discharge but as opportunities for experiential learning and personal transformation. When the Jews said na'aseh v'nishma, they recognized that God's commandments were given for their benefit, not just God's service.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Pirkei Avos
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
If God promised Avrohom family, fortune, and fame for leaving his homeland, how is this a test? The phrase 'lech lecha' reveals that mitzvos aren't sacrifices to appease God in exchange for rewards, but actions genuinely beneficial to us. This yesod reframes Torah study from burdensome obligation to opportunity for authentic human flourishing.
Why is silence called a "fence for wisdom" in Avos 3:13, and why is a healthy body found only in silence? The shiur develops the principle that speech can emanate from either the intellect or the body's physical drives. When speech expresses physical impulses rather than refined thought, the body gains independent momentum and man deteriorates from "adam" (person) into "basar" (flesh)—the transformation that occurred at the flood.
Why does the Mishna say there are three crowns when it lists four, and why is Kesser Shem Tov superior to the crowns of Torah, Kehunah, and Malchus? The shiur explains that Shem Tov means becoming the living definition of what's humanly possible—like Hillel, Rabbi Elazar ben Charsum, and Yosef HaTzaddik—so others see in you the true standard of halacha and mesirus nefesh. Chanukah celebrates this middah, as the Chashmonaim became the model of devotion, and the Menorah represents the Kesser Shem Tov that rises above all others.
Pirkei Avos 4:5
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does Avos 4:5 forbid learning Torah for honor or wealth when the Torah itself promises these very rewards? The shiur develops that Torah study isn't a sacrifice we endure to earn external rewards, but inherently beneficial for our spiritual and physical wellbeing. Honor and wealth flow naturally from Torah's inherent goodness, not as payment for something harmful.
