No community start suggestion yet.
How can Eishes Potiphar be called a 'chayah ra' yet also act leshem shamayim according to Rashi (רש"י)? The key distinction is between rationalization and genuine spiritual motivation. Eishes Potiphar found religious justification for her desires, making her the worst kind of predator, while the brothers who sold Yosef acted from authentic leshem shamayim despite personal difficulty.
This shiur addresses a complex question that troubled the speaker for many years: How can Eishes Potiphar be called a 'chayah ra' (wild animal) through Yaakov's ruach hakodesh, yet Rashi (רש"י) also says she acted leshem shamayim? The resolution reveals a profound insight about the nature of rationalization versus genuine spiritual motivation. The speaker begins by examining Rashi's commentary on Yaakov's prophetic statement 'chayah ra achalathu' (a wild animal devoured him), which referred not only to Yosef's apparent death but prophetically to Eishes Potiphar's future attempt to seduce him. Rashi explains that both Tamar and Eishes Potiphar acted leshem shamayim - Eishes Potiphar saw through astrology that she would have children connected to Yosef, though she didn't know if through him directly or through his daughter.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Vayeishev - Yaakov's response to Yosef's coat, Rashi's commentary
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi praise Yosef's brothers for refusing to speak peacefully to him? The shiur develops that the deeper mistake was allowing Yosef's psychological problems to become their emotional burden. Maintaining shalom - rather than internalizing others' issues - protects your well-being and gives you the only position from which to actually help them change.
Why does the Torah describe Yosef's rational refusal while the Gemara says he was saved by seeing his father's image? The shiur distinguishes two separate tests: first, the yetzer hara of pleasure (overcome through reason), then the yetzer hara of self-destruction from months of psychological pressure. Against self-destructive escape, only rebuilding genuine self-worth—not rational arguments—can provide salvation.
Why did Yosef tell a second dream after seeing his brothers' violent reaction to the first? The shiur develops a yesod based on the root connection between 'uman' (craftsman) and 'nemun' (trustworthy): true excellence requires viewing our abilities as sacred trusts rather than personal possessions. Yosef's test with Potiphar's wife proved he remained a facilitator, not an exploiter.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
