No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Midrash compare the giving of the moon (hachodesh hazeh lachem) to a small engagement gift, while Torah (תורה) seems infinitely greater? The shiur explores how erusin represents our relationship with Hashem (ה׳) in this finite world—where we control only temporal matters—while nisuin in Yemos HaMashiach elevates us to joint ownership (yish lotu b'nichsam shava b'shava) in the eternal world, where we affect even the cosmic reality itself.
Rabbi Zweig analyzes a Midrash that compares Hashem (ה׳)'s relationship with Klal Yisrael to a king who marries a woman. During erusin (engagement), the king gives small gifts; during nisuin (full marriage), he gives gifts "kivaal"—as a husband. The Midrash states that in this world (Olam HaZeh), Hashem gave us only the moon (hachodesh hazeh lachem), while in Yemos HaMashiach He will give us the firmament and stars (maskilim yaziru k'zohar harakiah). The fundamental question is: why is the moon considered a "small gift" when Hashem also gave us the Torah (תורה), which is infinitely greater? Rabbi Zweig develops a fundamental distinction between erusin and nisuin relationships. In erusin, we remain primarily subjects of the King, living in our father's house (beis aveha), confined to our finite world. In nisuin, we become primarily a wife in the husband's house (beis baala), elevated to His infinite world. The chiddush of nisuin is not merely consummation but rather "kivaal"—we gain yish lotu b'nichsam shava b'shava (joint ownership/partnership) in everything that is His. This transforms us from subjects receiving gifts in our world to partners sharing in His eternal reality.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bo - Shemos 12:2 (Hachodesh hazeh lachem)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!