A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) use the word "chok" only for Parah Adumah and not for earlier chukim like shatnez? The Taz's question reveals two levels of chukim: those the nations challenge ("What's the reason?") and those they use to denigrate us ("You're fools"). When a mitzvah (מצוה) is self-contradictory—purifying one person while contaminating another—the Torah must emphasize "zos chukas haTorah" to tell us: perform it despite the apparent foolishness.
The shiur explores a question posed by the Taz on a Rashi (רש"י) in Parshas Toldos. Rashi explains that the word "chukosai" in the verse "Eikev Avrohom listened to My voice...my chukim" refers to laws the nations challenge, such as the prohibitions of pig and shatnez. The Taz asks: if these are chukim, why doesn't the Torah (תורה) use the term "chok" here, as it does explicitly in Parshas Chukas regarding Parah Adumah ("zos chukas haTorah")? Why wait until Parah Adumah to declare something a chok when earlier laws like shatnez are also chukim? The answer lies in a careful reading of Rashi's language in the two contexts. In Parshas Toldos, Rashi describes chukim as "devarim she'yetzer hara umeshivin aleihem"—things that the nations challenge us about. The key word is "meshivin," meaning they question or challenge: "What are you doing? Why are you doing this?" This is a request for explanation, an intellectual challenge. The nations say, "Explain to me the reason for shatnez or the prohibition of pig." Our response is that we don't know the ultimate reason, but we follow Hashem (ה׳)'s command. This is uncomfortable but not humiliating—many things in life lack clear explanations, yet people accept them.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Toldos, Bereishis 26:5; Parshas Chukas, Bamidbar 19:2
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why did Potiphar's wife pursue Yosef, and what does Rashi mean when he calls her actions "leshem shamayim"? The shiur argues she correctly saw in astrology that she and Yosef would have a child—an unchangeable decree for most people. But as a descendant of Avrohom, whom Hashem lifted above the stars, Yosef possessed the unique power to bend astrological fate, transforming the prediction into fulfillment through her daughter (Osnas) instead.
Why did Hashem cure all the sick, blind, deaf, and lame before Matan Torah? The Rambam teaches that miracles require purpose. This shiur argues that the mass healing demonstrated that Torah is not meant for the downtrodden seeking comfort, but for healthy people who can fully channel their energies toward mitzvos and serve as proper examples to their communities.
Why does the Aramaic word for "accept" (Kabbalah) also mean "complain"? The shiur develops a profound insight: genuine acceptance only emerges from overcoming resistance. Without internal challenge, an idea merely passes through us—true commitment is born only when we wrestle with, resist, and ultimately decide to embrace a principle.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
