A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Did Hashem (ה׳) command Aharon's priesthood, or did Moshe initiate it and Hashem approve? The shiur uses Tosafos (תוספות) on Shabbos (שבת) 87a to argue that Hashem sometimes supports our decisions rather than initiating them. This reframes Korach's rebellion as questioning not whether Hashem spoke, but who initiated the message.
This shiur addresses a fundamental challenge in the story of Korach: how could the greatest leaders of Israel question Moshe Rabbeinu's appointment of Aharon as Kohen Gadol just one year after Sinai, when Hashem (ה׳) had guaranteed at Sinai that the experience would convince the people of Moshe's total reliability? Rabbi Zweig argues that this represents one of the most difficult questions regarding the authenticity of Judaism, since questioning any divine command opens the door to questioning all mitzvos. The answer comes through a profound insight from Tosafos (תוספות) in Shabbos (שבת) 87a regarding Moshe's separation from his wife Tzipporah. The Torah (תורה) states that after Sinai, Hashem told Moshe to remain available while everyone else returned to their tents. However, Tosafos explains that this separation was actually Moshe's own initiative, which Hashem then approved. The proof is that Aharon and Miriam criticized Moshe for this decision - if it had been clearly Hashem's original command, they would not have questioned it.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Korach
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why did Potiphar's wife pursue Yosef, and what does Rashi mean when he calls her actions "leshem shamayim"? The shiur argues she correctly saw in astrology that she and Yosef would have a child—an unchangeable decree for most people. But as a descendant of Avrohom, whom Hashem lifted above the stars, Yosef possessed the unique power to bend astrological fate, transforming the prediction into fulfillment through her daughter (Osnas) instead.
Why did Hashem cure all the sick, blind, deaf, and lame before Matan Torah? The Rambam teaches that miracles require purpose. This shiur argues that the mass healing demonstrated that Torah is not meant for the downtrodden seeking comfort, but for healthy people who can fully channel their energies toward mitzvos and serve as proper examples to their communities.
Why does the Aramaic word for "accept" (Kabbalah) also mean "complain"? The shiur develops a profound insight: genuine acceptance only emerges from overcoming resistance. Without internal challenge, an idea merely passes through us—true commitment is born only when we wrestle with, resist, and ultimately decide to embrace a principle.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
