A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
What does "lo hodatani" mean when Moshe tells Hashem (ה׳) "You didn't inform me"—even though Hashem clearly had? The pasuk uses "nasan einav v'libo," placing eyes and heart, which Rashi (רש"י) invokes both by Moshe viewing Jewish suffering and by Moshe's claim to Hashem. Real communication requires looking into the other person's face, sensing how they receive your words, not just delivering information—a principle Rabbi Zweig illustrates applies equally to marriage, employees, and even waiters.
Rabbi Zweig explores the dialogue between Moshe and Hashem (ה׳) in the aftermath of the Golden Calf, where the Jewish people's destruction has been averted and they will proceed to the Land of Israel. Moshe says to Hashem (Ki Sisa, page 466 in the text): "Re'eh—You say to me to take up the people, but You did not inform me (lo hodatani) whom You will send with me." Rashi (רש"י) notes that Moshe admits Hashem *did* say He would send an angel—so how can Moshe claim "You didn't tell me"? Rashi explains: saying something the listener doesn't accept is not real "telling." The key lies in Rashi's language. Rashi interprets "Re'eh" (literally "see") as "put your eyes and your heart" on what you are saying—an expression urging Hashem to focus on how His words land with Moshe. This same phrase appears earlier (page 16), when Moshe goes out to see the suffering of the Jewish people in Egypt. The pasuk says "vayar b'sivlosam"—he saw their burdens. Rashi says Moshe "placed his eyes and his heart to be distressed over them." Rabbi Zweig asks: what does this poetic phrase mean? Why isn't simple seeing enough?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Ki Sisa 33:12; Shemos 2:11
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
Why does Rashi describe Avrohom and Ephron's land deal as happening "between friends" when they just met? The shiur develops the principle that overpaying transforms business transactions into expressions of friendship and respect. Great people habitually overpay to ensure no one feels exploited, creating "lekach tov" situations where both parties benefit with dignity.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.