No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Balak need to explain to Moab what everyone already knew about Israel's victories? The shiur develops a psychological insight about how demagogues exploit insecurity to gain power. Balak convinced Moab their problem wasn't external threat but internal paranoia — making them disgusted with their own fearful existence and desperate enough to accept him as king.
Rabbi Zweig opens by contextualizing Parshas Balak within Israel's conquest east of the Jordan River, where they defeated the world superpowers Sichon and Og. The Torah (תורה) calls these nations "zroos olam" (arms of the world) — like the mythological Atlas holding up the globe. When Balak saw Israel's victories, he told the Moabites that these powerful nations had been their security blanket, and now they were exposed and vulnerable. The core question emerges: Why did Balak need to explain what everyone already knew? If a nation defeats superpowers, obviously weaker nations should be afraid. What was Balak adding to the equation? Rabbi Zweig develops a psychological insight about the difference between having a problem and being paralyzed by insecurity about the problem.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
How does the covenant of Arvot Moav differ from earlier obligations? The shiur develops the yesod that this covenant created a new level of unity — not just working for the same Master, but collectively becoming a reflection of Hashem's presence. When Klal Yisrael embraces yichud Hashem as a shared vision rather than individual service, future generations become bound, teshuvah becomes natural, and mutual responsibility reaches the depth of "kol Yisrael areivim zeh bazeh."
Why was Miriam punished with tzaraas when her criticism of Moshe seemed justified? The shiur develops a yesod based on a Midrash that Miriam's error wasn't lashon hara in the conventional sense — she actually intended to help with a shalom bayis issue — but rather her failure to search out Moshe's unique madrega and recognize that his separation from his wife was a halachic requirement for his level of nevuah, not just a chumra. This reframes the entire mitzvah of "zachor es asher asah Hashem" as an obligation to actively seek out people's hidden ma'alos.
Parshas Balak 22:2-4
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
