No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Moshe demand that Pharaoh provide animals for sacrifices, yet never actually accept them after the tenth plague? The Ramban (רמב"ן) questions whether such an offer was serious, since "the sacrifice of the wicked is an abomination." The shiur proposes that had Pharaoh released the Jews before Makas Bechoros—submitting to God's authority through choice rather than terror—his sacrifices would have constituted genuine teshuvah and been acceptable.
The shiur analyzes a puzzling exchange between Moshe and Pharaoh after the ninth plague. Pharaoh agrees to let the Jews leave but wants them to leave their livestock behind. Moshe responds not only that they will take their own animals, but that Pharaoh himself will provide animals for sacrifices: "V'gam atah titen b'yadeinu zevachim u'olaos la'asos l'Hashem (ה׳) Elokeinu" (Shemos 10:25). However, there is no evidence in the Torah (תורה) that Pharaoh ever actually provided such animals. The Ramban (רמב"ן) asks a fundamental question: Why would Moshe propose accepting sacrificial animals from Pharaoh at all? The principle of "zevach reshaim to'eivah"—the sacrifice of the wicked is an abomination—should preclude accepting or offering sacrifices on behalf of a wicked person like Pharaoh. The Ramban therefore concludes that Moshe's statement was not a serious request but rather a rhetorical way of saying, "You'll be so desperate to save yourself that you would even offer us animals if we asked."
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Shemos 10:25-26, 12:31
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why did Potiphar's wife pursue Yosef, and what does Rashi mean when he calls her actions "leshem shamayim"? The shiur argues she correctly saw in astrology that she and Yosef would have a child—an unchangeable decree for most people. But as a descendant of Avrohom, whom Hashem lifted above the stars, Yosef possessed the unique power to bend astrological fate, transforming the prediction into fulfillment through her daughter (Osnas) instead.
Why did Hashem cure all the sick, blind, deaf, and lame before Matan Torah? The Rambam teaches that miracles require purpose. This shiur argues that the mass healing demonstrated that Torah is not meant for the downtrodden seeking comfort, but for healthy people who can fully channel their energies toward mitzvos and serve as proper examples to their communities.
Why does the Aramaic word for "accept" (Kabbalah) also mean "complain"? The shiur develops a profound insight: genuine acceptance only emerges from overcoming resistance. Without internal challenge, an idea merely passes through us—true commitment is born only when we wrestle with, resist, and ultimately decide to embrace a principle.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.