No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) transpose chalash (weak) to nachash (snake) when describing those Amalek attacked? The shiur develops a yesod that Amalek represents self-destructiveness—destroying oneself just to hurt others. The real danger isn't the sin itself but the depression and resignation that follow, turning weakness (chalash) into the destructive snake (nachash). This insight is the foundation of Elul: never give up.
The shiur opens with the pasuk in Ki Seitzei describing how Amalek attacked those who were "necheshelim acharecha" (trailing behind). Rashi (רש"י) explains these were people weakened by sin. Rabbi Zweig asks why the Torah (תורה) transposes the letters shin and lamed—the word should be "nechalashim" (weak) but instead reads "necheshelim," evoking "nachash" (snake). This cannot be coincidental; there must be an intrinsic connection between weakness (chalash) and the snake (nachash). To understand this connection, Rabbi Zweig analyzes a Gemara (גמרא) in Sanhedrin where Rav Yochanan says about Mashiach, "Let him come, but I don't want to see him." The Gemara asks why, and Reish Lakish quotes a pasuk describing the Messianic era's tragedies: a person escapes a lion, encounters a bear, comes home, leans against the wall, and is bitten by a snake. Reish Lakish challenges this, saying such tragedies happen every day—the santar (government agent) takes your real property, tax collectors (the bear) take your personal property, and you come home to find your children starving.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How was Yitzchok comforted after Sarah's death through marrying Rivka? The Hebrew 'vayinachem' means both comfort and change of direction, revealing that healing comes through shifting focus outward. Depression and mourning are self-absorbed states; true comfort emerges when we channel our pain into caring for others.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Ki Seitzei 25:17-18
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
How could Avrohom keep the entire Torah before it was given, including rabbinical laws? The key insight is that mitzvos represent eternal spiritual realities, not just historical commemorations, so Avrohom could access these truths through his genuine search. His entire 172-year journey—even his early idolatry—retroactively became service of God once he reached ultimate truth.
