No community start suggestion yet.
How can Potiphar's wife be both "for the sake of heaven" and an "evil beast"? The shiur builds on Rashi (רש"י)'s juxtaposition of Tamar and Potiphar's wife to argue that doing something "l'shem shamayim" without respecting what the Almighty actually wants is not a true relationship. Love without respect is control, not devotion.
Rabbi Zweig analyzes a remarkable contradiction in Parshas Vayeishev. When Yaakov sees Yosef's bloodied tunic, he declares that an "evil beast" devoured his son. Rashi (רש"י) explains that this was a prophetic reference to Potiphar's wife, who would later attempt to seduce Yosef. Yet the Torah (תורה) interrupts the narrative of Yosef's sale to insert the story of Yehuda and Tamar—and Rashi explains that the juxtaposition teaches that just as Tamar acted "l'shem shamayim" (for the sake of heaven), so too did Potiphar's wife act l'shem shamayim. She saw through astrology that she was destined to have children through Yosef, though she didn't realize this would come through her daughter Osnas marrying him. The question is stark: How can someone act for the sake of heaven and simultaneously be called an "evil beast"? Rabbi Zweig explores what it means to truly act l'shem shamayim through several examples. He contrasts Potiphar's wife with Korach and his followers. The Mishna teaches that a dispute "not for the sake of heaven" is one like Korach's. Yet Korach and his cohorts were willing to risk their lives, which suggests they genuinely believed they were acting for heaven's sake. Rashi explains that Korach was driven by jealousy of Moshe. The key principle emerges: when a person has the rational ability to recognize their impure motivations—jealousy, lust, vengeance—then even if they delude themselves into thinking they act for heaven, the Sages do not characterize their actions as l'shem shamayim. A person is responsible for self-delusions they could have caught.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 37:32-33, 39:1
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
