A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Rashi (רש"י) connect Amalek's attack specifically to the sin of false weights and measures? The shiur develops that Amalek represents the archetype of the 'letz' who believes nothing is absolute and that humans are the ultimate arbiters of morality. False weights reflect this same relativism - 'if no one knows, what's the harm?' - making Jews vulnerable to Amalek's attack when they adopt such thinking.
This shiur examines three interconnected questions about Amalek's attack on the Jewish people. First, why does Rashi (רש"י) connect Amalek's attack specifically to the sin of false weights and measures, rather than more seemingly serious transgressions? Second, what drives Amalek to engage in essentially self-destructive behavior - a 'kamikaze attack' where they knew they would be destroyed while inflicting minimal damage? Third, how can the Torah (תורה) criticize Amalek for not fearing God when fear of God is not one of the seven Noahide laws? The key insight centers on understanding two types of 'fear of God.' While Gentiles are not obligated in the mitzvah (מצוה) of emotional awe and love of God required of Jews, they must recognize that their actions have eternal consequences - that God cares about their behavior. This recognition creates a relationship with the eternal, which is fundamental to human existence itself. Without this connection, a person doesn't truly feel they exist.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Ki Seitzei 25:17-19
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
