A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
How could Chazal derive that the Kohen Gadol must be strong from Aharon's tenufah of 22,000 Levim, if it was miraculous? The shiur distinguishes between the act of lifting (which Aharon did) and the miracle (that he didn't get tired). This proves Aharon had genuine physical strength.
This shiur examines a fundamental question arising from Parshas Beha'aloscha regarding the tenufah (lifting ceremony) that Aharon performed on all the Levim. The Torah (תורה) describes Aharon lifting 22,000 Levim, which would be physically impossible in a normal timeframe, leading to the understanding that a miracle occurred. However, Chazal derive from this episode that a Kohen Gadol must be physically strong (bekayach). This creates an apparent contradiction: if the tenufah was miraculous, how can we prove from it that the Kohen Gadol needs natural strength? Rabbi Zweig addresses this difficulty by carefully analyzing what aspect of the tenufah was miraculous versus what was natural. He argues that if Hashem (ה׳) performed the entire miracle by levitating the Levim, then Aharon would have contributed nothing to the process, making it purely a divine act rather than a ma'aseh Kohen Gadol (act of the High Priest). This would render meaningless any attempt to derive requirements for the Kohen Gadol's physical capabilities.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Beha'aloscha
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why did Potiphar's wife pursue Yosef, and what does Rashi mean when he calls her actions "leshem shamayim"? The shiur argues she correctly saw in astrology that she and Yosef would have a child—an unchangeable decree for most people. But as a descendant of Avrohom, whom Hashem lifted above the stars, Yosef possessed the unique power to bend astrological fate, transforming the prediction into fulfillment through her daughter (Osnas) instead.
Why did Hashem cure all the sick, blind, deaf, and lame before Matan Torah? The Rambam teaches that miracles require purpose. This shiur argues that the mass healing demonstrated that Torah is not meant for the downtrodden seeking comfort, but for healthy people who can fully channel their energies toward mitzvos and serve as proper examples to their communities.
Why does the Aramaic word for "accept" (Kabbalah) also mean "complain"? The shiur develops a profound insight: genuine acceptance only emerges from overcoming resistance. Without internal challenge, an idea merely passes through us—true commitment is born only when we wrestle with, resist, and ultimately decide to embrace a principle.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
