A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Midrash emphasize Yaakov's daughters (plural) comforting him when he only had one daughter, Dinah? The shiur develops a yesod from Rashi (רש"י) that Dinah was originally Yosef transformed into female form, making her the "feminine Yosef." This becomes the basis for understanding that a spouse is not merely related to but actually part of one's child—a reality with profound implications for relationships and even halacha (הלכה).
The shiur analyzes a perplexing Midrash on Parshas Vayechi addressing the pasuk "vayakumu kol banav v'chol benosav lenachamo"—all his sons and daughters arose to comfort him. The Midrash asks: Yaakov only had one daughter (Dinah), so why does the Torah (תורה) use the plural "benosav"? The Midrash cryptically adds "halvai kovrah"—he wished he had buried her. Rabbi Zweig poses three fundamental questions: First, why does the Midrash need to add the statement about wishing to bury Dinah—wouldn't the question work just as well without it? Second, why does the Midrash answer that "a person is not restrained from calling his son-in-law 'son' and his daughter-in-law 'daughter'"—what does this have to do with actual daughters? Third, why does the Torah teach this lesson specifically here, when there were many other opportunities throughout the Torah to convey this principle? The shiur builds its answer on a fundamental Rashi (רש"י) in Parshas Vayeitzei. When Leah became pregnant with what would have been her seventh son, she prayed it should be a girl so that Rochel would have at least two of the twelve tribes. Through Leah's prayer, the child was transformed in utero from male to female—from what would have been Yosef into Dinah. Rabbi Zweig draws a critical distinction between two ways to understand this transformation. Rabbeinu Gershom Meor HaGolah explains that Leah was pregnant with Yosef while Rochel was pregnant with Dinah, and they switched. According to this view, Dinah was Rochel's child who happened to be born from Leah. But Rashi's language suggests something more radical: Yosef himself became Dinah—the same neshamah transformed from male to female. According to this reading, Dinah is not just any daughter; she is the feminine version of Yosef.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Bereishis 37:35, Vayechi
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
