No community start suggestion yet.
How can we derive the halacha (הלכה) that a goy who hits a Jew is chayav misah from Moshe killing the Egyptian, when the Egyptian was also an adulterer? The shiur establishes that we study the Torah (תורה)'s written account—not historical events—and derive halacha from what the Torah records. The Torah's narrative presents only the beating, making that the basis for the halachic consequence.
Rabbi Zweig addresses a fundamental question in how we derive halacha (הלכה) from Torah (תורה) narratives. The Gemara (גמרא) learns from the story of Moshe killing the Egyptian that a goy who strikes a Jew is chayav misah (deserving of death penalty). The Rambam (רמב"ם) specifies this is misah b'dinei Shamayim (death at the hands of Heaven), not a human court execution. Rashi (רש"י) adds that Moshe invoked the Shem HaMeforash (Divine Name), and Hashem (ה׳) carried out the execution. The central question arises from the fact that Rashi identifies this Egyptian as someone who committed adultery with Shelomis bas Divri. If the Egyptian deserved death for adultery, how can we derive a general halachic principle that a non-Jew is liable for hitting a Jew? Perhaps he died specifically because of the adultery, not the assault.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Shemos 2:11-12 (Moshe killing the Egyptian)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.
