No community start suggestion yet.
Why did God eventually tell Bilaam to go curse the Jews after initially forbidding it? The principle 'in the path a person wants to go, God leads him' reveals that God actively assists us in pursuing even wrong choices to preserve free will. Success therefore proves only that we want something badly enough, not that we're doing the right thing.
Rabbi Zweig analyzes the enigmatic story of Bilaam from Parshas Balak to reveal a fundamental principle of Jewish thought that most people live opposite to. The principle, derived from the Talmud (תלמוד), states that 'in the path a person wants to go, God leads him along' (B'derech she'adam rotzeh leilech, molichin oto). This means that God not only permits us to make our choices but actively assists us in pursuing them, even when they are wrong choices. When Bilaam initially sought to curse the Jewish people, God told him not to go. However, after persistent badgering, God eventually said 'go,' and when Bilaam later offered to turn back, the angel encouraged him to continue. This demonstrates that God gives us a comfort level in making even bad choices, not out of approval but to preserve our free will. The shiur explores why Bilaam, despite engaging in morally reprehensible behavior including bestiality, achieved prophetic levels. Rabbi Zweig explains that Bilaam connected to the aspect of God that grants humans independence and space to make their own choices. His prophecy came from tapping into God's daily moment of 'anger' - the divine frustration that results from empowering beings who can rebel against their Creator. This daily divine frustration represents the price God pays for giving humans free will, allowing us to achieve genuine accomplishments rather than being mere puppets. The principle has profound implications for how we measure success. Most people mistakenly view their success as proof they are doing the right thing, but success merely indicates that we want something badly enough. God assists us in achieving our goals regardless of their moral value because restricting our choices would undermine our free will. However, this principle has crucial limitations. While individuals can destroy themselves through poor choices, God prevents communities from destroying themselves or the world. This is illustrated through the examples of Noah's ark, the Exodus from Egypt, and Moshe's death, where God intervened 'on that very day' to prevent communal destruction. The shiur addresses the frightening reality that we can be successful in immoral endeavors while feeling divinely supported. The only protection against this deception is to actively ask moral and halachic questions before making decisions, consulting with others, and genuinely seeking what is right rather than justifying what we want. Rabbi Zweig emphasizes that most people decide what they want to do first, then find ways to justify it, rather than starting with the question of what is morally correct. True spiritual growth requires using our God-given space and freedom to ultimately reconnect with our Creator, not to distance ourselves from Him. When we genuinely seek to do the right thing, God provides the same level of assistance He gives to those pursuing wrong paths, but channeled toward positive outcomes.
Parshas Balak
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why did "all the house of Israel" mourn Aharon while only "Bnei Yisrael" mourned Moshe? Aharon's unique peace-making method empowered people by showing that conflicts stem from internal struggles, not others' actions against them. This created functional families rather than just individuals, transforming the nation's very structure from three million people into 600,000 family units.
Why does the parah adumah simultaneously purify the impure and defile the pure? Building on Rabbi Elazar HaKalir's striking insight, the shiur reframes chukim as expressions of divine love rather than authoritarian decrees. This one mitzvah exists purely for God's sake among the 613, teaching that authentic love allows space for the other's needs without requiring understanding or personal benefit.
Are chukim divine decrees requiring blind obedience, or something else entirely? The shiur reveals that 'chok' derives from 'cheik' (embrace), not authoritarian control - chukim represent mitzvos where God says 'trust Me, this benefits you' based on our relationship. This transforms how we understand both divine service and chinuch from power dynamics to expressions of love and trust.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
