No community start suggestion yet.
Why was Moshe considered uniquely wise for taking Yosef's bones when all Jews were fulfilling mitzvos that night? The shiur develops a yesod about communal versus individual leadership perspective. Moshe demonstrated true communal thinking by addressing a collective obligation while others pursued personal mitzvos, teaching us to engage in community needs beyond our immediate interests.
This shiur examines the Torah (תורה)'s account of Moshe taking Yosef's bones from Egypt during the Exodus, focusing on several challenging questions from Rashi (רש"י) and the Talmud (תלמוד). The lecture begins by questioning why Yosef obligated his brothers rather than his children to ensure his burial, unlike Yaakov who directly obligated his sons. The Talmud's statement that 'a wise heart takes mitzvahs' (chakam lev yikach mitzvahs) referring to Moshe raises the question of why this was considered uniquely wise when all Jews were fulfilling mitzvahs that night by borrowing silver and gold from the Egyptians. The shiur addresses the apparent contradiction between the Torah stating that Moshe took Yosef's bones and Joshua's later reference to the Jewish people taking them out of Egypt. The Talmudic principle that when someone begins a mitzvah (מצוה) but doesn't complete it, credit goes to the finisher, seems problematic since Moshe didn't voluntarily abandon the task but died before entering the Land.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Aggadita
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does God identify Himself at Sinai as 'the God who took you out of Egypt' rather than as Creator of the world? The shiur reveals that this establishes a king-subject covenant rather than an owner-property relationship. This transforms mitzvos from divine impositions into a character development system designed for our benefit - we are God's agenda.
How long must Hashem tolerate the Jewish people's rebellious behavior? A Midrash compares this to the halachic question of carrying a child holding muktze on Shabbos. The analysis reveals that rejecting Eretz Yisrael represents a deeper spiritual corruption than individual acts of avoda zara.
Parshas Beshalach 13:19
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why did Rabbi Akiva laugh while his colleagues wept upon hearing Roman military exercises? The shiur uses Yisro's dual reaction to the Exodus - joy for Jewish salvation yet pain for Egyptian destruction - to show that converts retain a universal perspective alongside Jewish commitment. This broader view allowed both Yisro and Rabbi Akiva (also from converts) to perceive divine restraint and justice that pure Jewish perspective might miss.
What did Dovid mean when he reduced the 613 mitzvos to twelve principles? The Gemara reveals that mitzvos have two dimensions: fulfilling the obligation and achieving personal completion (hashlomah). Dovid identified twelve core principles that encapsulate the essential character development aspect of all mitzvos.
