No community start suggestion yet.
How can secret charity be greater than Moshe Rabbeinu, and what distinguishes overcoming divine af versus cheimah? The highest tzedakah isn't just anonymous giving but creating dignified earning opportunities, which restores life-force rather than merely preventing its withdrawal. This corresponds to God acting as Judge rather than Creator withdrawing His presence.
This shiur examines a profound Gemara (גמרא) from Bava Basra 9b teaching that "Gadol ha'oseh tzedakah b'seiser" - one who gives charity secretly is greater than Moshe Rabbeinu. Rabbi Zweig analyzes several complex questions: What does "shochad b'cheik" (bribery in the pocket) mean as a form of charity, and how can bribery be considered "matan b'seiser" (secret giving)? The Gemara cites the verse "matan baseser yichpeh af, v'shochad b'cheik cheimah azah" but there's disagreement between Rabbi Elazar and Rabbi Yitzchok about whether secret charity can overcome both divine anger (af) and fury (cheimah) or only af. Rabbi Zweig addresses Tosafos (תוספות)' question about the apparent contradiction - in one Gemara Moshe could kill cheimah but not af, suggesting cheimah is weaker, while here cheimah seems stronger than af. He explains that af and cheimah are not forms of judgment (mishpat) but represent God's withdrawal from His life-giving connection to humanity. Af means God stops infusing new life-breath into people, while cheimah means He consumes even the life-force already given.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Aggadita
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
How long must Hashem tolerate the Jewish people's rebellious behavior? A Midrash compares this to the halachic question of carrying a child holding muktze on Shabbos. The analysis reveals that rejecting Eretz Yisrael represents a deeper spiritual corruption than individual acts of avoda zara.
Bava Basra 9b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What did Dovid mean when he reduced the 613 mitzvos to twelve principles? The Gemara reveals that mitzvos have two dimensions: fulfilling the obligation and achieving personal completion (hashlomah). Dovid identified twelve core principles that encapsulate the essential character development aspect of all mitzvos.
