No community start suggestion yet.
Why has world leadership declined so dramatically in the last fifty years? The shiur examines Parshas Beshalach's account of the war with Amalek to uncover a fundamental principle: true strength comes not from self-discipline but from attachment to a cause beyond oneself. Moshe's instruction to Yehoshua—"choose for us men"—means warriors who are both mighty and God-fearing, because fighting for a transcendent principle empowers a person far beyond mere self-control.
Rabbi Zweig opens by observing a striking phenomenon: the dramatic decline in the quality of world leadership between the first and second halves of the twentieth century. The first half produced towering figures—Roosevelt, Churchill, Stalin, Hitler, Mao—leaders of principle (whether for good or evil), while the second half has given us far weaker figures. The same pattern appears in Israeli leadership: the founders were visionaries and philosophers, while contemporary leadership is, in Rabbi Zweig's words, "a tremendous embarrassment." What accounts for this change? The answer emerges from Parshas Beshalach's account of the war with Amalek. When Amalek attacks Israel at Refidim, Moshe tells Yehoshua, "Bechar lanu anashim v'tzei v'locheim ba'Amalek"—choose for us men and go out to fight against Amalek. Rashi (רש"י) comments on the phrase "for us" (lanu): Moshe equated Yehoshua to himself, teaching that the honor of one's student should be as dear as one's own. But why does the Torah (תורה) choose this particular context—a military instruction—to teach a lesson about the teacher-student relationship? And why does Rashi interpret "anashim" (men) to mean both "mighty" and "God-fearing"? If their merit will help them win, why do they need physical strength? If their strength will win, why do they need virtue?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Beshalach 17:8-9
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
