A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the mitzvah (מצוה) of sending away the mother bird use the double language "shalach teshalach" instead of the negative "lo tikach"? The shiur develops the yesod that shiluach hakan is about kavod hashaleim—respecting nature and its processes—which in turn creates tikun hashaleim, personal spiritual refinement. This respect for the parenting of a bird ultimately leads to one's own merit as a parent.
The shiur opens with a textual question on the mitzvah (מצוה) of shiluach hakan: why does the Torah (תורה) use the double language "shalach teshalach" (you shall surely send away) rather than simply stating the prohibition "lo tikach haeim al habanim" (do not take the mother with the children)? The Midrash states that one who fulfills this mitzvah is "kedai shetinatzeil"—worthy to be saved—but the precise connection between the double language and this reward requires clarification. Rabbi Zweig rejects the interpretation that "shalach teshalach" refers to being sent away from Gehinnom through a play on words, as this doesn't address why the Torah shifts from the negative formulation (lo tikach) to the positive command (shalach teshalach). Instead, he proposes that the shift in language reflects a fundamental shift in the nature of the mitzvah itself. The prohibition "lo tikach haeim al habanim" could be understood merely as a resource management law—don't deplete the species by taking both mother and offspring together. This would be a form of bal tashchis, a limit on consumption. However, the positive command "shalach teshalach" reveals a deeper dimension: the Torah is teaching kavod hashaleim, respect for nature itself.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Ki Seitzei 22:6-7
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
