No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Egypt cry endlessly for Yaakov while Israel's mourning for Moshe ended after thirty days? The shiur contrasts two models of leadership: Yaakov provided blessing and sustenance, leaving dependents who felt helpless without him; Moshe built independence, developing a nation capable of conquering Eretz Yisrael on their own.
Rabbi Zweig analyzes the striking difference between the mourning periods described in Parshas Vayechi for Yaakov Avinu and for Moshe Rabbeinu. The Torah (תורה) states that Egypt cried for Yaakov for seventy days, with the crying continuing beyond the formal mourning period ("vayavru yemei bechiso"), while for Moshe, the crying ended precisely when it was supposed to end ("vayitmu yemei bechi"). This linguistic distinction—"vayavru" (passed) versus "vayitmu" (completed)—raises a fundamental question about the nature of their leadership and its impact. The shiur begins by noting an apparent paradox: Moshe Rabbeinu, who took the Jewish people out of Egypt, gave them the Torah, split the sea, and provided the manna, seemingly generated less emotional attachment than Yaakov. The Midrash cited by Rashi (רש"י) expresses the people's initial resistance to Moshe's death, yet after thirty days, the mourning was complete. By contrast, the Egyptians—who were not even Yaakov's children—cried continuously, with their grief extending beyond the prescribed mourning period.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 47:28, 50:3-4; Devarim 34:8
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!