No community start suggestion yet.
How could Yitzchok give the brachos to Esav when he knew Esav's flaws? The shiur develops that there are four forefathers - Avrohom, Yitzchok, Yaakov, and Yisrael - representing different spiritual levels. Esav was naturally suited to become the fourth forefather 'Yisrael,' embodying the complete destruction of evil rather than just choosing good, but forfeited this role through his selfish choices.
This shiur addresses fundamental questions about Parshas Toldos, beginning with the puzzling question of how Yitzchok could want to give the brachos to Esav when he clearly knew Esav's character. The Rav demonstrates through various Rashis that Yitzchok was fully aware of Esav's flaws - he became blind from the smoke of Esav's wives' idol worship, he suspected Esav of theft, and he knew Esav didn't use Hashem (ה׳)'s name. The answer lies in understanding that there are actually four forefathers, not three: Avrohom, Yitzchok, Yaakov, and Yisrael. The Midrash reveals that Yitzchok was called both Avrohom and Yisrael, showing that each forefather embodies multiple characteristics that are passed down to their descendants. Yaakov represents the continuation of Avrohom's qualities, while Yisrael was meant to represent Yitzchok's contribution.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How can Yaakov embody emes (truth) while seemingly deceiving Yitzchok to obtain Esav's blessing? Yaakov intentionally created doubt rather than perfect deception, hoping Yitzchok would discover him and consciously choose to bless someone embodying both spiritual depth and practical capability. True emes means maximizing others' choices and dignity rather than manipulating them.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Toldos
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why did Yitzchok need to re-dig Avrohom's wells, and why does the Torah emphasize his disputes with local shepherds? The shiur develops the principle that wells represent communal sovereignty, not private property. Yitzchok's well disputes established Jewish governmental authority over Be'er Sheva within Philistine territory, creating the two-tiered sovereignty necessary for spiritual elevation outside Eretz Canaan proper.
