Rabbi Zweig explores why the Torah (תורה) uses the word 'if' when commanding the Omer offering, revealing that we must perform mitzvot not just out of obligation, but with the enthusiasm of a volunteer.
Rabbi Zweig begins by examining a peculiar aspect of the Minchas Omer (Omer offering) in Parshas Emor. The Torah (תורה) states 'v'im tachrid minchas bikurim' - 'and if you bring the meal offering of first fruits' - using the conditional word 'im' (if) despite this being a communal obligation. Rashi (רש"י) explains that here 'im' means 'you must,' but this raises a fundamental question: why would the Torah use confusing language when it could simply state the obligation directly? The answer reveals a profound psychological insight: the Torah deliberately uses 'if' to teach that even obligatory mitzvot must be performed with the enthusiasm of a volunteer. We must do mitzvot not merely because we're commanded, but as if we genuinely want to do them. This addresses the Talmudic principle that it's greater to perform mitzvot when commanded than when volunteering - but only when the commanded person maintains the same enthusiasm as a volunteer. Rabbi Zweig connects this to the laws of Passover, where the Torah states 'ushmartem et hamatzot' - guard the matzot. The Talmud (תלמוד) reads this as both 'matzot' and 'mitzvot,' teaching that just as matzah requires constant attention to prevent it from becoming chametz, mitzvot require constant enthusiasm. A mitzvah (מצוה) performed lackadaisically becomes like chametz - worse than not performing it at all, because it breeds resentment. The shiur explores the story of Haman finding Mordechai studying the laws of Omer on the second day of Passover. Haman, despite being learned in Jewish law, declared that 'your Omer overtook all the money I spent trying to destroy you.' Rabbi Zweig explains that the Omer represents Jews working to be comfortable with themselves through Torah study, which is fundamentally about one's relationship with oneself. Haman, as an Amalekite driven by hatred and destruction, was deeply uncomfortable with himself - and this self-hatred drove his obsession with destroying others. This leads to practical applications for Jewish parenting and education. When children resist performing mitzvot, parents face two approaches: forcing compliance through authority (creating resentment) or finding proper motivation. The Rambam (רמב"ם) teaches that children are motivated by sweets, adolescents by money, and adults by honor and respect. While some worry that external motivation corrupts the mitzvah, the Talmud assures us with the principle 'mitoch shelo lishma ba lishma' - from performing for the wrong reasons, one comes to perform for the right reasons. The experience of mitzvot is so inherently fulfilling that external motivation eventually becomes unnecessary. Rabbi Zweig emphasizes that the worst message we can give our children is that 'it's tough to be a Jew.' Instead, we must create homes where Jewish living is experienced as joyful and fulfilling. This requires patience and wisdom in motivation, but the Torah guarantees that sustained mitzvah performance, even if initially externally motivated, will eventually lead to genuine enthusiasm and internalization of Jewish values. The goal is raising children who are comfortable with themselves and their Judaism, leading to comfort with others and the broader world.
Rabbi Zweig challenges Freudian psychology by arguing that the basic human drive is not pleasure-seeking but rather the painful awareness of non-existence, and explains how only a relationship with God can provide the feeling of true existence and simcha.
An exploration of the deeper meaning of 'amirah' (saying) as empowering others by recognizing their uniqueness and building meaningful relationships through authentic, individualized communication.
Parshas Emor, Vayikra 23:10
Sign in to access full transcripts